He has bought Russian anti-aircraft defence systems causing conniptions across the NATO alliance. He refuses to join western sanctions on Russia. He has talked of his special relationship with Vladimir Putin and the two countries' mutual need for each other. The man who started out advocating his country's membership in the EU is taking Turkey in a different and unpredictable direction.Įrdogan is the Kremlin's choice, the devil Putin has come to know and find useful even if their relations are entirely transactional. What's not to like in the chancelleries of Europe and Washington?Ĭontrast that with Erdogan. With his position apparently strengthening ahead of round two in these elections, there will be almost certainly disappointment in the West.Įrdogan's rival Kemal Kilicdaroglu is not well known outside Turkey but to Western policy makers he had offered a tonic to the friction and frustrations generated by Recep Tayyip Erdogan.Īn accountant and bureaucrat with a reputation as a clean politician and secularist who wants to restore Turkish western relations and trust with NATO allies. His defeat would have been welcomed as a sign of things to come, the humbling of one populist strongman with others perhaps to follow. A hard truth to swallow for his NATO allies who will have been hoping, albeitly privately, for change.Įrdogan's increasingly authoritarian rule, economic eccentricity and waywardness within NATO have all caused deepening alarm among allies. President Erdogan will have been Vladimir Putin's favourite in this election. Here our international affairs editor Dominic Waghorn explains why. While the result could change Turkey's future, it could also have a huge impact on the war in Ukraine. Turkey's current president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has been in power for two decades, and is going up against the opposition leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu. HOME - CATALOG - REVIEWS - NEWS - ABOUT US - CONTACTĬOMBATREELS.It might sound irrelevant to this blog, but over in Turkey people are heading to the polls to pick their president, and their choice is being closely watched around the world. No Myths, just truth.ĬONTACT - MILITARY WEBSITE LINKS - PRIVACY These movie films are great entertainment and we enjoy watching them ourselves but if you want to see real history, then you need to check out the world war II movies from CombatReels. In fact a lot of raw footage that has appeared in movies from wwi through the present day many times is not of the location, time, etc. Many people making these movies are not historians and many times they do not get good advice or review by specialists if they even use them at all. They may be based on some premises that are accurate, but there are thousands of historical inaccuracies in movies that have been produced. If it is not originally filmed in HD, then it's not real HD. Truth: There were no HD cameras in World War II, you cannot upsize so to speak with the resolution and turn 2D photography into high definition. Some are better than others with the flesh tones and uniforms. Look at the trees you may see and you cannot discern any leaves. What you see is computer enhancement / colorization. Truth: In Europe the majority of film that was shot and what has survived is black and white. Myth 2: Wow that's great color on that show. ![]() ![]() So if the film and if its sound quality are good, typical scenes are award ceremonies and similar events. When sound appears, the sound is typically done with a static microphone. The cameras of the day did not have sound built in, they required a second operator with a sound boom/mike to capture the sound. Truth: Most of the footage taken in combat situations was actually silent film. Myth 1: All the sound you hear is awesome!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |